nslookup -> host,not dig [was Re: FC1 multiple ethernet interface issue]
David Benigni
dbenigni at lutron.com
Tue Feb 15 19:58:45 UTC 2005
This is why we love computers right? Learn something new every day! :)
Dave
>>> mattdm at mattdm.org 2/15/2005 2:47:16 PM >>>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:32:31PM -0500, David Benigni wrote:
> trust me, I'm the same way. I still can't get my fingers to type
dig
> instead of nslookup.
Ooh, you probably don't want to anyway. I see this *so* many times (and
did
it myself). The nslookup deprecation message says:
Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future
releases.
Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead. Run nslookup
with
the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
and for some reason, people's brains shut off when they get to "dig",
without going on to the next command, "host". I know mine did, and it
took
me a while to figure out this important bit of information:
The "host" command is the one you want 99% of the time. It does what
nslookup was mostly used for, *way better*.
'dig' is generally pointless.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
<http://www.mattdm.org/>
--> Fedora Users & Developers Conference, hosted by Boston University
<--
February 18th, 2005
<http://fedoraproject.org/fudcon/>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
More information about the users
mailing list