HTML Editor / Bluefish

Michael A. Peters mpeters at
Sun Jan 9 21:48:22 UTC 2005

On 01/09/2005 10:11:09 AM, Scot L. Harris wrote:

> I tried earlier versions of bluefish so it may have improved greatly
> since then.  However, I found Quanta+ to be better at the time.

It has.
I started using it I think in the middle of 2000, when it wasn't quite  
so hot.
It has improved quite a bit IMHO.

At the time I actually preferred NEdit - but bluefish was gtk and I  
must admit, I'm almost obsessive about wanting all my gui apps to be  
gtk (I like consistancy in UI), so I used bluefish and watched it  

Bluefish is really nice now. Been very good for at least a year imho.

I don't really personally care for gui html editors, I always found I  
had to clean them afterwards with a text editor anyway.

A proffesional web dev may have different needs than me though, so I  
can't say how good it is in that field.

More information about the users mailing list