HTML Editor / Bluefish
Michael A. Peters
mpeters at mac.com
Sun Jan 9 21:48:22 UTC 2005
On 01/09/2005 10:11:09 AM, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> I tried earlier versions of bluefish so it may have improved greatly
> since then. However, I found Quanta+ to be better at the time.
I started using it I think in the middle of 2000, when it wasn't quite
It has improved quite a bit IMHO.
At the time I actually preferred NEdit - but bluefish was gtk and I
must admit, I'm almost obsessive about wanting all my gui apps to be
gtk (I like consistancy in UI), so I used bluefish and watched it
Bluefish is really nice now. Been very good for at least a year imho.
I don't really personally care for gui html editors, I always found I
had to clean them afterwards with a text editor anyway.
A proffesional web dev may have different needs than me though, so I
can't say how good it is in that field.
More information about the users