IS FC3 stable?

[Pete]

Thanks Aly, I'll look into that one too.

Pete

Aly Dharshi wrote:

> There is also something called Courier IMAP which is a fairly robust 
> POP and IMAP system, which should be included into future FC series. I 
> find that its fairly powerful, haven't used it in a while though.
>
> One thing to remember about Courier IMAP is that IT IS A MAILDIR ONLY 
> system.
>
> Cheers,
>
>     Aly.
>
>> I agree Cyrus is different, and not necessarily in a bad way.  But I 
>> would still like to see a bit more supporting doc's if it's included 
>> in the distro.  And I love vi, it's just not having to remember the 
>> options and configuration parameters to hundreds of programs that I 
>> don't like.  Even a partial front-end is often all one needs to 
>> configure and implement a new package.  I also don't really mind 
>> editing files, if I know after I'm done it's all going to work.  
>> Front-end's usually make that process a bit easier.  I remember the 
>> days of Xenix and Unix, and I don't long for the days when everything 
>> was done through vi.  It's called progress.  And as I often say to 
>> the Linux newcomers, I was into Linux before it was cool, lol, I just 
>> have better things to do than edit 6 or 7 files.  And thanks for the 
>> pointer for Dovecot, that might fit my needs better.  I was 
>> distressed to see my pop3 server from RH9 was gone, and dovecot 
>> doesn't really say 'POP SERVER' to me, so I over-looked it.
>>