FC3 - i'm disapointed
Kiryl Hakhovich
administrator at bsolution.net
Fri Jan 14 16:14:10 UTC 2005
m g wrote:
>>Unfortunately, that stability is gone.
>>
>>
>
>If you want RHEL or Debian Stable, you know where to find them.
>
>
Guys,
you got to be kidding me.
i thought i have made it clear - FC1 and FC2 was a lot more stable and
what we call Linux systems that prove that they work better.
As of now FC3 - seems to me the worst out of 3 releases. ok!?
Example NetworkManager - WTF!? when it's running FC3 hardly get's IP
address. after you stop it - it's all cool. This kind of little things
are all over the place.
Now the test phase has been finished for FC3 - and i don't even think of
posting anything to bugzilla.
(if i would be a beta user then it's a different story)
I hope this makes it clear my point and where i'm going with it.
Thanks.
PS. again - it was clean install, updates constantly installed, and
kernel updates are not as upgrades but only as addition to the system,
so i can roll over to the old kernel.
Common guys, do not try to make end-user out of me :-) be serious here.
More information about the users
mailing list