owner of /etc /boot and / (related to can't su thread???)
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jul 8 13:49:43 UTC 2005
Paul Howarth wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am Fr, den 08.07.2005 schrieb Shawn um 8:13:
>>>> quite recently I mistakenly did something like chown -R jr /
>>>> I wonder if etc and boot shouldn't properly be owned by root?
>>> Sure, they have to be root owned.
>> They *have* to be root ownership? What is there which will not function
>> if they are not root ownership?
> Anything that was originally owned by root will "work" as before, but
> represents a potential security issue as user "jr" will now have
> access to them and that user should not have that access.
Please use shorter lines.
That is not much of a security hole. OTOH, given the propensities
of this particular user...
> Anything that was originally owned by a different user than root is
> likely not to work, because the process that needs to access that data
> will be running as the correct userid, not "jr".
Yes, like the news reader, perhaps. But you didn't address my question as
asked. What, specifically, *must* be owned by root?
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the users