Fostering Cooperation (was Yum and EXTRAS)
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt.tmp0501.nospam at arcor.de
Wed Jun 8 21:19:00 UTC 2005
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:35:14 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> Seems unusually consistent to me. Dag had the same understanding too:
>
> http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/FAQ.php
And with that there is the jump back to May 31st, where I asked in
this thread:
"?? Do you refer to Dag's not so friendly paragraph in his FAQ?"
Sorry, but unless you present actual solutions -- such as a concept on
inter-repository collaboration/coordination/cooperation -- this is a dead
end.
> |>Yeah, as I wrote before (base+extras) is the new base. Again the effect
> |>is to pull packages from the RPMForge orbit into Extras, which because
> |>of its "enabled by default" feature and Fedora relationship is likely to
> |>become the uber-repo that you envisage.
> |
> | Which is a good thing.
>
> High quality GPL'd packages coming out of Extras have to be a good thing
> for everybody. RPMForge getting packages sucked out of it does not
> sound like a good thing for most people.
How is your second sentence above meant to be understood?
> |>It's encouraging that "Cooperation is possible" then... but this is new
> |>information to me.
> |
> | As long as you can't explain where your "cooperation is impossible"
> | theory comes from, I cannot comment on this. Then there's still the
> | question what kind of cooperation do you think of?
>
> Lol...
Bad form unless you want to stop a serious discussion abruptly.
> since you today noted that cooperation is possible, I am pleased
> to agree with you it is possible. But anyone reading your old document
> will not come away with that impression I think. Maybe you should
> update it with this case where cooperation is possible.
I realise you still don't [want to] understand what that old Wiki page
tries to point out.
> Anyway, I detect we are going around in circles and not moving forward,
> you are welcome to the last word.
Fine. How about you get to the gory details? Really, what changes do you
want?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050608/6ed5edbf/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the users
mailing list