Setting up named as secondary
Dan Trainor
info at hostinthebox.net
Fri Jun 10 23:38:52 UTC 2005
Mark wrote:
> Damn, I found it: I only have UDP but no TCP open for port 53.... That's when using the official IPs. So that works now.
>
> The VPN IPs still don't work, although those go through a cipe tunnel and should not get blocked by the firewall.
> Ssh works too without problems, so why not named?
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
>>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:04 PM
>>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>>Subject: Re: Setting up named as secondary
>>
>>
>>Am Sa, den 11.06.2005 schrieb Mark um 0:46:
>>
>>
>>>I have a master and secondary DNS server. The secondary
>>
>>tries to do a
>>
>>>zone-transfer from the master, but reports a connection refused.
>>>However, the master claims it approved the transfer.
>>
>>>The master configuration file is:
>>
>>>zone "my-domain.com" {
>>> notify no;
>>> type slave;
>>> file "pz/named.<MY_DOMAIN>.com";
>>> masters { 192.168.1.136; };
>>>};
>>
>>Paste error? Saying it is the master and the zone definition
>>does not match.
>>
>>Side note: if you are running bind chrooted the slave zone
>>files have to be located into the slaves directory.
>>
>>
>>>MARK
>>
>>Alexander
>>
Mark -
If you don't mind me asking (and I just got done restoring my stuff, so
forgive me for not having on-site archives to re-read your origional
post), which distribution of BIND did you use? Did you roll y our own,
or did you use Fedora's RPM?
Thanks
-dant
More information about the users
mailing list