Setting up named as secondary

[Dan Trainor]

Mark wrote:
> Damn, I found it: I only have UDP but no TCP open for port 53.... That's when using the official IPs. So that works now.
> 
> The VPN IPs still don't work, although those go through a cipe tunnel and should not get blocked by the firewall.
> Ssh works too without problems, so why not named?
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com 
>>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
>>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:04 PM
>>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>>Subject: Re: Setting up named as secondary
>>
>>
>>Am Sa, den 11.06.2005 schrieb Mark um 0:46:
>>
>>
>>>I have a master and secondary DNS server. The secondary 
>>
>>tries to do a 
>>
>>>zone-transfer from the master, but reports a connection refused. 
>>>However, the master claims it approved the transfer.
>>
>>>The master configuration file is:
>>
>>>zone "my-domain.com" {
>>>        notify no;
>>>        type slave;
>>>        file "pz/named.<MY_DOMAIN>.com";
>>>        masters { 192.168.1.136; };
>>>};
>>
>>Paste error? Saying it is the master and the zone definition 
>>does not match.
>>
>>Side note: if you are running bind chrooted the slave zone 
>>files have to be located into the slaves directory.
>>
>>
>>>MARK
>>
>>Alexander
>>

Mark -

If you don't mind me asking (and I just got done restoring my stuff, so 
forgive me for not having on-site archives to re-read your origional 
post), which distribution of BIND did you use?  Did you roll y our own, 
or did you use Fedora's RPM?

Thanks
-dant