rpmbuild

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Do, den 16.06.2005 schrieb Matthew Miller um 0:42:

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:04:52AM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > That didn't change with FC4. I suggest to install rpm-devel too.
> 
> You shouldn't need rpm-devel unless you're actually writing or compiling
> programs which make rpm library calls -- package manager meta-stuff.

> Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>

Thank you Matthew for having an open eye :) In fact I did not mean
rpm-devel, but redhat-rpm-config to have debuginfo packages and debug
coded stripped binary rpms from an rpmbuild process. Sorry for
confusing.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp 
Serendipity 00:48:26 up 22 days, 23:26, load average: 0.14, 0.16, 0.19 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050616/21d5fc16/attachment-0002.bin