Yum repros wanted
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt.tmp0501.nospam at arcor.de
Fri Jun 24 16:31:47 UTC 2005
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:04:59 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> Sean O Sullivan wrote:
> > The more repo's you want, the more conflicts and dependancy issues you
> > will have - it is not a good idea to add every repo you can find.
> >
> > Personally, base/updated-released/extras, then dag and freshrpms are
> > very reliable I find. atrpms i usually fine, although wouldn't use for a
> > server. Other than that wouldn't touch many others - especially not
> > livna ( http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/FAQ.php#D )
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sean
> >
>
> Are you sure about that? The way I heard it, livna and extras were part
> of the same mold. Now I'll let Dag and Axel speak for themselves, but
> the impression I got from following the link you gave is that they
> wouldn't even want you to use extras, just because the extras
> maintainers won't "play nice" with them.
What solution could you think of?
--
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at users.sf.net>
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
loadavg: 1.00 1.03 1.05
More information about the users
mailing list