top posting, HTML posting and "the closer"
mdw1982 at mdw1982.com
Thu Mar 31 11:03:09 UTC 2005
Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:36 -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
>>>so... if i changed the wikipedia definition to allow top posting, and to say
>>>it should be used by everyone, would we all be happy!!!
>>to my mind I would think that if the majority of list suscribers prefer
>>bottom posting to top posting then common curtosy should be all that is
>>needed here. the rules on HTML mail go without saying.
> Then why are you saying it?
> Sorry, couldn't resist. :-)
>>HTML mail has
>>*no* place in the Linux world for technology lists... period! Zero
>>tolerance... no deposit no return... thats just how it is.
> Ah, it is all so clear now - The Rules(TM) according to you.
> Why is what you find acceptable any more valid than what I do? I know
> that there is historical convention, but to blithely say that "This Is
> The Way It Is" with no authority and unable to cite anything except
> suggestions from Usenet doesn't really sway me.
> Again, I prefer bottom posting and non-HTML messages, but I think it's
> silly to get all wound up about it when someone prefers top posting or
> HTML formatted. It's no skin off my nose and thus far it has presented
> no impediment to my reading of their messages. In the unlikely event
> that a message is so badly formatted that I can't read it, hey, the
> delete key works just fine on my keyboard. No reason to get upset.
honestly, I personally believe we get wound up about this simply because
its a sidebar or pause from trying to ferret out problems with systems
remotely that we don't have first hand knowledge about; an escape as it
were to relieve the tension that builds up from trying to diagnose
troubles. In plain words its a distraction. but thats just my two cents.
Others' milage may vary.
Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R)
Linux User Since 1996
Powered by Mandrake Linux 8.2, 10.0 & RH Fedora Core 3
More information about the users