gnome or kde

[Charles Li]

--- jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net> wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2005 04:42 pm, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:40:23PM -0700, Charles
> Li wrote:
> > > Which is better for slow machine?
> >
> > Basically, "neither". You're really askin' for a
> religious flame war here,
> > but both KDE and GNOME are very full-featured and
> complicated desktop
> > environments. For an older/slower machine, I'd
> suggest something more
> > bare-bones instead. XFCE, or just plain Window
> Maker or Fluxbox.
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org       
> <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> > Boston University Linux      ------>              
>  <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> > Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit.
> 
> I agree on all points. Also an old box - -  what
> flavor??
> 
> I run a 800 Mhz Athlon with 512 MB using KDE quite
> comfortabally.
> A 300 Mhz and 128MB might be another issue.
> -- 
> John H Ludwig
> 
> Common sense is so rare, why do they call it
> common!!!
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
I am using a p2-mmx 400mhz

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com