No FC2 updates anymore in all repo's?

[Temlakos]

Andy Green wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Danny Terweij wrote:
> 
> | --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> | Error: missing dep: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) for pkg apt
> ...
> | That is the point where I am... i dont know how to solve that.
> |
> | Thank you for the help.
> 
> If I understand this correctly, many of these problems are coming from
> apps like apt you installed from a non-Fedora RPM, and because you did
> not add the repo that contains the FC3 version of these non-Fedora RPMs,
> yum has no way to upgrade them and complains about the old, incompatible
> libs needed by the FC2 version.
> 
> My solution would be to rpm -e, for example, apt, synaptic, bittorrent,
> opensc and as many of the other FC2-specific things you installed that
> do not have an FC3 version available in Fedora, and do the yum update
> again and see what errors are left.
> 
> - -Andy
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFCmNiYjKeDCxMJCTIRAsjaAJ95tQLMBw3FyOEmvmVak5mBTvCa9ACghKPR
> eN+KHuk14lGI6vgqCkyoGT4=
> =heyK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

Well then, let's all agree on something: how long after the public 
release of FC4 should we wait until most non-Fedora repos (freshrpms, 
atrpms, dag, dries, etc.) develop their FC4 versions? I assume that 
extras, base, and updates-released are the main Fedora repos that we 
would use.

Temlakos