Fedora Triaging and QA

Rudolf Kastl che666 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 2 17:05:23 UTC 2005


hi rahul!

very interesting information actually. i hope alot experienced users
jump on the train and help with testing. its in everyones interest to
keep his stuff working. also i like the idea to move _everything_ to
updates-testing first.

regards,
rudolf kastl

2005/11/2, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com>:
> Hi
>
> For those who have been wanting to improve the quality of releases, get
> effective dialogue and responses in bugzilla and work on reducing the
> chances for regressions in Fedora updates, here is a good opportunity to
> get involved.
>
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/gregdek/2714.html. Contact gregdek AT
> redhat.com
>
> There are some low hanging fruits that the community can potentially
> tackle in a better way. Every new update is first pushed into
> updates-testing repository to enable the community to test and check for
> regressions and provide feedback in the fedora-test list and  the
> relevant bugzilla reports. The amount of feedback at times have been
> very low and thats usually ok for the large majority of updates but some
> of the them are heavy impact ones like the Kernel or Xorg updates and do
> require community testing. Internal testing does not always reveal
> regressions in specific chipsets, architecture and hardware . If you
> have a spare test machine lying around that you could use and you would
> like to tinker and get involved in Fedora, updates-testing and the
> Fedora development tree are for you.
>
> General guidelines and instructions are available at :
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/TestingGuide
>
> regards
> Rahul
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>




More information about the users mailing list