FC3 -> FC4 upgrade leaves old packages

[Andy Green]

Ed Swierk wrote:

> My guess is that anaconda decided not to upgrade certain updated FC3
> packages whose FC4 counterparts had lower version numbers.
> 
> Have others run into this problem? I would like to help my colleagues
> avoid the same mess when they upgrade.

Yeah I saw it when downgrading from the development branch on one machine.

Can you compare, say,

rpm -qa | grep glibc

to the glibc* on FC4 base, eg

glibc-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                                     30-May-2005
16:16  4.2M
glibc-2.3.5-10.i686.rpm                                     30-May-2005
16:16  5.7M
glibc-common-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                              30-May-2005
16:16   14M
glibc-devel-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                               30-May-2005
16:16  1.9M
glibc-headers-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                             30-May-2005
16:16  594K
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.94.i386.rpm                       20-May-2005
14:36  706K
glibc-profile-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                             30-May-2005
16:16  1.1M
glibc-utils-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm                               30-May-2005
16:16   98K

-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20051110/32a2f9fd/attachment-0002.bin