X.org's DRI vs. ATi's Proprietary driver (Was: "Re: ATI Livna driver package (Something has changed)")

[Strong]

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:17 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> the video performance is visibly better on some of the more complex 
> screen savers with the ATI-fglrx driver then with the one built in to
> the 
> kernel.
Does anybody know, Why nvidia 3D-graphics support is excluded from the
default kernel, as opposed to ATI-ones?

-- 
Best regards,
Strong.