Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken

[Mike McCarty]

akonstam at trinity.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:57:03PM +0930, Tim wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 14:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>
>>>Also a GUI tends to be a moving target, thereby making
>>>what documentation there is out of date.
>>
>>A good GUI shouldn't need documentation, though; it should explain
>>itself intuitively, and provide some hints for the more difficult bits.
> 
> I have an ex-student who made a claim like this recently. His company
> produces a product that needs no documentation. It is "intuitively
> obvious" he says.
> Balderdash. I am still waiting for the program that needs no
> documentation. I think I will die first. Linux Journal put me on to

My code doesn't need documentation... It's self-documenting. See
how obvious it is? And NO COMMENTS!

:-)

We've all heard that line before in a dozen different ways.

[snip]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!