ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Tue Apr 4 16:51:32 UTC 2006
>> I wonder if the way some cables are formed makes it easier to wire it
>> one way or another? Hand wrangling the wires into the right place to
>> crimp on a plug can be a right pain. You've got untangle wires, cross
>> some over others, and get them all to go into the plug the same
>> distance. It would have been a lot easier to do that if they'd come up
>> with a wiring arrangement different from the current specs. i.e. A pair
>> on 1 & 2, the next on 3 & 4, the next on 5 & 6, the last on 7 & 8,
>> instead of having the break apart pairs and straddle others. I
>> seriously doubt that would have degraded noise rejection.
Mikkel L. Ellertson:
> It has to do with backward compatibility. Remember, the same jacks
> are used for more then Ethernet.
I've read about that, but I really do not think it's a sensible thing to
mix phone and ethernet wires together in the one connector as a standard
thing to do.
> One consideration is being able to plug an RJ-11 plug into an RJ-45
> jack. (Not really a good idea, as it can bend the outside pins of the
> jack...) The center 4 pins on a RJ-45 jack are the same as a RJ-11
I agree, even with the little plastic spacer that you can fit around
them, they're not a good fit.
For a long time, here in Australia, those weak little RJ style plugs
were not used. I think I only really saw them come out when modems hit
about 14k speeds. And when we did use them, we had smaller 6 pin
connectors on phone cables compared against the larger 8 pin connectors
on ethernet. It was quite obvious, just from looking at plugs and
sockets, which was supposed to go in where. Now there's a trend to use
the larger 8 pin connectors on everything. Though inconsistently, for
instance the phone usually has the small 6 pin socket on the handset
unit, but the larger 8 pin at the wall-socket end of the cable.
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users