Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution

[Terry Snyder]

On 4/18/06, Erik Hemdal <ehemdal at townisp.com> wrote:
>
> Software Updater fails to apply updates on my system because an update
> for evolution requires libpisock.so.8.  Same thing happens with a
> conventional 'yum update' -- the dependency check fails.
>
> My system has libpisock.so.9 installed with the pilot-link package.
> It's a fresh install of FC5.  This is only the second yum update I have
> run on the machine.  So that explains why the dependency is missing, but
> not how it came about.  Is this due to a conflict between evolution and
> pilot-link; a user error; or a packaging problem somewhere along the
> line?
>
> Can't find anything in the recent list postings, which is why I'm
> posting.  Anyone else see this?
>
> Thanks!   Erik
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


You are not alone, I am getting the same error.  I have not had time to look
into it yet.  I have noticed that I have not gotten some of the other
updates yet from firefox and some the things released today.
--
Terry Snyder Jr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060418/e4e419b7/attachment-0002.html