Mozilla Suite vs. Firefox
fc-cornette at insight.rr.com
Sun Apr 30 11:50:19 UTC 2006
Mike Chalmers wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Jim Cornette <fc-cornette at insight.rr.com> wrote:
>> Kam Leo wrote:
>> >> Seamonkey has a lot better spell checking capabilities and uses the
>> >> profiles as mozilla/netscape. I use the seamonkey suite and am waiting
>> >> for rpms for the suite to make it to make it to extras. Mozilla will
>> >> soon be removed from core. Seamonkey will soon be in Extras.
>> > It is already in Extras.
>> >> Jim
>> Version is seamonkey-1.0.1-1.fc6 and it adds mail icon that looks the
>> same as the mozilla version. The browser has the seamonkey logo vs the
>> red mozilla Icon. Everything seems to work fine with the rpms on FC5.
>> It's easy to get on the internet and forget you have a life
>> -- Topic on #LinuxGER
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list at redhat.com
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> In package manager I have two seamonkey packages. One is "seamonkey -
> 1.0-11.fc5.i386" and the other one is "seamonkey - 1.0.1-1.fc5.i386".
> Isn't "seamonkey - 1.0.1-1.fc5.i386" the newer one?
> Also, what are extras? I keep hearing people saying that packages are
> in extras. Are extras the package manager?
The 1.0.1 is newer. I believe that everything before the - is release
I guess there is an FC5 release. My extras repo that was setup as
default did not pull in the FC5 version. At least it is the 1.0.1 version.
It's easy to get on the internet and forget you have a life
-- Topic on #LinuxGER
More information about the users