needed help on MINICOM
andy at warmcat.com
Thu Feb 2 20:40:50 UTC 2006
Mike McCarty wrote:
> I'd say, complicated to get going, but easy to use
> after that.
That was my experience when I did use it too.
> It's much better since being rewritten. It used not to
> work very well. Lots of SIGSEGV.
It does have some advantages... like working over ssh on a machine with
no X libs. Some people swear by it. The U-boot guys don't like it though
Over time, many people have reported problems when trying to use the
"minicom" terminal emulation program for serial download. I (wd)
consider minicom to be broken, and recommend not to use it. Under
Unix, I recommend to use C-Kermit for general purpose use (and
especially for kermit binary protocol download ("loadb" command), and
use "cu" for S-Record download ("loads" command).
Anyway I settled on Commi, which seems not to be maintained any more,
but since it just seems to work as far as intended and still compiles
that's not critical.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060202/8d6c049c/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the users