Hard drive cable question -

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Fri Feb 24 20:17:07 UTC 2006


James Kosin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
>>Well, Recommended Standard 232 was one of those which had
>>much more in it than most people needed, so a lot of the
>>pins got hijacked. It was the Standard people loved to
>>violate. A disc drive interface is (1) less generally
>>useful and (2) less amenable to hijacking for other
>>purposes.
>>
>>Mike
> 
> 
> Over reading many specs, I've found that they are to be used as
> guidelines more than definitive absolutes.
> 
> Some manufacturers take the definitions literally, and some take a more
> liberal approach to the specifications.

I have to agree with this. And I also agree that one cannot
rely on specs too much. I dunno how many pieces of equipment
I've written drivers for did *not* perform according to the
docs.

I wouldn't buy a disc cable which had a yellow connector on it,
though.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the users mailing list