Is Anyone Using Alternate I/O Schedulers?
David Cary Hart
Fedora at TQMcube.com
Thu Jan 5 18:11:47 UTC 2006
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:06:26 -0500
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett at verizon.net> opined:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 11:23, David Cary Hart wrote:
> >"Anticipatory" is the default but both Deadline and CFQ are compiled
> > into the stock kernels.
> I've been using the cfq schedueler for the last year or so, seems to be
> more desktop friendly than anticipatory was.
I just changed to that (alas, my laptop did not explode). I have been unable to
determine any difference. I guess that I should leave our server alone?
Our DNSRBL -
Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.php
FSS v. AHBL SLAPP Suit: http://www.TQMcube.com/ahbl.php
Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.php
Zombie Graphs: http://www.TQMcube.com/zombies.php
More information about the users