yum db lossage
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
wolfgang+gnus200607 at dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com
Mon Jul 10 15:30:57 UTC 2006
Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> writes:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>> $ rpm -qi fedora-release
>> [root at arbol ~]# rpm -qi fedora-release
>> package fedora-release is not installed
>> How do I recreate that?
>
> # rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs \
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/fedora-release-5-5.noarch.rpm
[root at arbol ~]# rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/fedora-release-5-5.noarch.rpm
Retrieving http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/fedora-release-5-5.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
/bin/sh is needed by fedora-release-5-5.noarch
After I threw in a "--nodeps" it seemed to be happy.
> How many packages does this list:
> $ rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n"
>
[root at arbol ~]# rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n" | wc
661 661 19001
I seem to be missing half of the installed rpms. This machine's
fraternal twin has twice that number. (While I might have missed
installing one or two packages on one or the other machine, this
difference is quite high).
[root at ancho ~]# rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n" | wc
1138 1138 33205
Barring any other good ideas, I'm tempted for finish populating the
database from the extra entries on the other machine and running some
checking script to see if the RPMs were really installed. Sigh.
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
More information about the users
mailing list