fc5: install everything?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon May 8 18:46:44 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 11:42 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2006, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >> It is just not worth my time. Next time it will be SUSE instead.
> >>
> >> -Frank
> >
> > Good luck with that. I have a SUSE box that has virtually nothing
> > installed by default. You think Fedora's installation is sparse? I was
> > amazed at the total lack of packages installed in SUSE. Really, it's a
> > total joke to work on that server. It has KDE /and/ GNOME installed (on
> > a /server/ no less) and yet I had to install the sysstat packages along
> > with ntpd and about 3 or 4 others just to make the server really
> > manageable. The SUSE install is just silly. The Fedora installer is at
> > least more /sane/ than most other installers I've seen or used.
> >
> > But it seems rather childish to switch distros just for that. Kind of
> > like taking your ball and going home, eh?
>
> I found the FC5 lack of 'install everything' to be a really serious pain
> on the machine I built a week and a half ago as I had to do it three or
> four times in a row as I worked through the problems I was having with
> install media.
>
> It is aggravated by the fact that choosing a group of things doesn't
> actually mean you get everything in that group, either, and so you have to
> manually tick through nearly *every* menu to make sure that you have
> actually have a full install.
You can right click on a group in both the Installer and Pirut to select
every package in a group. Otherwise you might use kickstart.
Rahul
More information about the users
mailing list