Show-stopper for me

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Thu Nov 9 02:43:42 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 09:48 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> My main bitch about the $70 webcam wasn't sharpness, but the
> absolutely atrocious color rendition, as if there was zero 
> contrast in the vectorscope axis that represented skin tones.

I think you'd want to find a CCD, not CMOS, camera, if you wanted to get
one with a better than average picture quality.  I've yet to see a good
CMOS-based camera, of any type (webcam, or otherwise).  Even now, lots
of CCD cameras look worse than the old tube cameras.

I work in video production.  I've had the chance to do all sort of
comparisons.  I've got some 1970s LDH1s that still look better than some
modern home video cameras.  Colourwise, at least...

-- 
(Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.




More information about the users mailing list