Lost my RAID
Justin Piszcz
jpiszcz at lucidpixels.com
Fri Sep 15 14:01:45 UTC 2006
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Martin Marques wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:42:16 +0100, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone told me I would have to rebuild the array with mdadm, but I want
>> to know if I would loose data doing so.
>>
>> You should just be able to re-add sdb1 to the array and it'll rebuild in
>> the background. No data loss.
>
> Thats what I'm seeing right now.
>
> Now, the old entry of sdb1 is still in the md0, but with state removed.
>
> (output of mdadm -D /dev/md0)
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
> 1 0 0 - removed
>
> 2 8 17 1 spare rebuilding /dev/sdb1
>
>
> Is that OK?
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' ||
> Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
> Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador,
> del Litoral | Administrador
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
I believe so, that removed entry /should/ go away after /dev/sdb1
re-enters the array.
Justin.
More information about the users
mailing list