About Firewall configuration

edwardspl at ita.org.mo edwardspl at ita.org.mo
Tue Apr 3 12:40:26 UTC 2007


aragonx at dcsnow.com wrote:

>>Hello,
>>
>>If all of server are NOT DMZ, then they can be assigned ( used ) Private
>>IP ?
>>    
>>
>
>Okay, DMZ adds a layer of complexity but really has no bearing on the
>private IP range.
>
>What is it you are trying to accomplish?
>
>Your DMZ can be behind your NAT box but does not have to be.  Some DMZ
>setups look something like this:
>
>
>Internet
>   |
>   |
>   |
>   v
>Border router
>   |      |
>   |      |
>   |      |
>   v      v
>DMZ1    DMZ2    DMZ3   ...
>   |
>   |
>   |
>   v
>Internal firewall
>   |            |
>   |            |
>   |            |
>   v            v
>Computer1   Computer2   Computer3
>
>
>So, in this case, you can use either your border router or your internal
>firewall as your NAT box.  Either will do but the border router might be a
>better choice.
>
>Of course your DMZ boxes should be single tasked.  Therefore, each should
>only have 1 or so ports that are accessible from either your internal
>network or the Internet.  There is much much more to this though.  Like,
>your DMZ boxes should not be allowed to initiate connections, especially
>to your internal network.  There should be no connections coming in to the
>internal firewall from the Internet or the untrusted network.  Etc...
>  
>
My means :
The Server machine is not DMZ, so can it use Private IP only ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070403/ac7d9dce/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the users mailing list