NVIDIA Sata - Slow Disk (Second Try)

Lonni J Friedman netllama at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 19:00:20 UTC 2007


My disks are all Seagate.  My only guess is that this is some weird
Samsung disk firmware issue, but I really don't have any good ideas.
If you have any non-Samsung disks to test that might shed some light.
You should also verify that you're using the latest motherboard BIOS.

On 4/9/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I got the parameter in question from one of the
> mailing lists where it is claimed to increase the performance. In my
> case however, it did not make much of a difference. I am pasting the
> output from "hdparm -i" as well as "hdparm -I" which gives us the
> information about the disk.
>
> Srikanth
>
> # hdparm -i /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
>  HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
> # hdparm -I /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
>
> ATA device, with non-removable media
>         Model Number:       SAMSUNG HM100JI
>         Serial Number:      S0EFJ10L500218
>         Firmware Revision:  YH100-13
> Standards:
>         Used: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 0
>         Supported: 7 6 5 4
> Configuration:
>         Logical         max     current
>         cylinders       16383   16383
>         heads           16      16
>         sectors/track   63      63
>         --
>         CHS current addressable sectors:   16514064
>         LBA    user addressable sectors:  195371568
>         LBA48  user addressable sectors:  195371568
>         device size with M = 1024*1024:       95396 MBytes
>         device size with M = 1000*1000:      100030 MBytes (100 GB)
> Capabilities:
>         LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
>         Queue depth: 32
>         Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
>         R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16  Current = 16
>         Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
>         Recommended acoustic management value: 254, current value: 0
>         DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
> *udma6 udma7
>              Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
>         PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
>              Cycle time: no flow control=120ns  IORDY flow control=120ns
> Commands/features:
>         Enabled Supported:
>            *    SMART feature set
>                 Security Mode feature set
>            *    Power Management feature set
>            *    Write cache
>            *    Look-ahead
>            *    Host Protected Area feature set
>            *    WRITE_BUFFER command
>            *    READ_BUFFER command
>                 NOP cmd
>            *    DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
>                 Advanced Power Management feature set
>                 SET_MAX security extension
>                 Automatic Acoustic Management feature set
>            *    48-bit Address feature set
>            *    Device Configuration Overlay feature set
>            *    Mandatory FLUSH_CACHE
>            *    FLUSH_CACHE_EXT
>            *    SMART error logging
>            *    SMART self-test
>                 General Purpose Logging feature set
>            *    IDLE_IMMEDIATE with UNLOAD
>            *    SATA-I signaling speed (1.5Gb/s)
>            *    Native Command Queueing (NCQ)
>            *    Host-initiated interface power management
>            *    Phy event counters
>                 DMA Setup Auto-Activate optimization
>                 Device-initiated interface power management
>            *    Software settings preservation
> Security:
>         Master password revision code = 65534
>                 supported
>         not     enabled
>         not     locked
>                 frozen
>         not     expired: security count
>                 supported: enhanced erase
>         88min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT. 88min for ENHANCED SECURITY ERASE
> UNIT.
> Checksum: correct
>
>
>
>
> Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> > With a similar setup I'm seeing about 60MB/s for buffered disk reads
> > using sata_nv.  Why are you booting with the combined_mode=libata
> > option?  Does the performance change without that option?
> >
> > Specifically what kind of SATA disk are you using?
> >
> > On 4/9/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I am running FC6 (with latest update, 64-bit) on AMD Dual Core with 1GB
> >> RAM. It contains a SATA hard disk. I am experience sluggishness when
> >> files are opened or closed (saved). I suspect that i have slow SATA
> >> performance even though i am not sure. I have following stats.
> >>
> >> # hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
> >>
> >> /dev/sda:
> >>  Timing cached reads:   2452 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1226.48 MB/sec
> >>  Timing buffered disk reads:   86 MB in  3.03 seconds =  28.35 MB/sec
> >>
> >> I am concerned about 28.35 MB/Sec speed here.
> >>
> >> # hdparm -i /dev/sda
> >>
> >> /dev/sda:
> >>  HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> >>
> >> # dmesg | grep -i sata
> >> sata_nv 0000:00:0e.0: version 3.2
> >> ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE800 ctl 0xE482 bmdma 0xE000 irq 21
> >> ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE400 ctl 0xE082 bmdma 0xE008 irq 21
> >> scsi0 : sata_nv
> >> ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> >> scsi1 : sata_nv
> >> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> >>
> >> # lsmod | grep -i sata
> >> sata_nv                29509  4
> >> libata                120553  1 sata_nv
> >>
> >> Kernel Boot Parameter
> >> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 ro root=LABEL=/1 noquiet
> >> combined_mode=libata
> >>
> >> Any suggestions/recommendations/comments are welcome.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Srikanth
> >
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama at gmail.com
LlamaLand                       http://netllama.linux-sxs.org




More information about the users mailing list