Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Res]

On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, linuxmaillists at charter.net
> wrote:
>> No it has something to do with the function not being open
>> source or something like that. It was on another mailing
>
> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
>
>

BS, if the code producers have a complete package  and fedora decide they
dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a part
of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the
correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the
code producers.



> --
> Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


-- 
Regards,
Res