Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

Ed Greshko Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Tue Apr 10 02:30:24 UTC 2007


Res wrote:
> On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, linuxmaillists at charter.net
>> wrote:
>>> No it has something to do with the function not being open
>>> source or something like that. It was on another mailing
>> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
>>
>>
> 
> BS, if the code producers have a complete package  and fedora decide they
> dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a part
> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the
> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the
> code producers.

Can you point us to the srpm available on openoffice.org website?




More information about the users mailing list