Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Res]

On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:41 pm, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res wrote:
>> > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
>> BS, if the code producers have a complete package  and fedora decide
>> they
>> dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a
>> part
>> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the
>> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the
>> code producers.
>
> Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's not free software, it
> can't
> be included.
>

but it is stripped, as it is not the same code as released by OOo



> --
> Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


-- 
Regards,
Res