Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 4/9/07, Res <res at ausics.net> wrote:
> On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:48 pm, linuxmaillists at charter.net wrote:
> > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400,
> > linuxmaillists at charter.net wrote:
> >> > No it has something to do with the function not being
> >> > open source or something like that. It was on another
> >> > mailing
> >>
> >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
> >
> > It is stripped because it was there from the source. Can't
> > legally include is just their opinion.
> Exactly, and yet another nail in fedoras coffin

You can't possibly be putting nails in Fedora's coffin for following the law.

Are you the same guy bitching every time Fedora is caught following
safe legal practicies?


> > The cool thing is I can override their opinion and put it
> > back the way the developers provided it for all to use as
> > we decide too.
> Yes, and time to consider other versions of Linux that dont mutilate :) or
> maybe I'll just stick to solaris at home
> > --
> > If the word following begins with
> > a vowel, the word you want is...
> > to read the rest of this, go here
> > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Res


-- 
Fedora Core 6 and proud