Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Peter Gordon]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 23:36 -0400, linuxmaillists at charter.net wrote:
> I have not been talking about this from a legal view point 
> only from a user view point.

And once you are fully aware of the the legal viewpoint and understand
*why* it can't be included, then you will have a much more appropriate
user's viewpoint. 

Hope that helps.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ 
About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070409/992e358a/attachment-0002.bin