ATRPMS dependencies conflict

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:39:05PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
> 
> > But allow me to post a warning: Once a package you use from ATrpms
> > requires another (sub)package as found in ATrpms, but is shadowed by
> > livna, or a package in freshrpms requires another (sub)package from
> > freshrpms which is now shadowed by ATrpms and livna, or a package from
> > dries <and so on>, then you get peculiar bugs that are specific to how
> > you setup your system and the priorities, e.g. it is not even
> > reproducable by other users that use the same repos.
> >
> > The repo maintainers may have tried to provide sane packages
> > compatible with the other repos, but the priorities revert this work.
> >
> > This is called selective/partial enabling of a repo and no repo will
> > support any issues that may yield out of this. Because, as said, the
> > resulting bugs are of a rather per host nature.
> 
> Thanks for the warning. taken on board.
> 
> I *think* the only problem I had was with ffmpeg. There seems to be a 
> definitive difference in how this is packaged between livna and atrpms that 
> leads to conflicts. If this could be fixed I would be happy to try again 
> without priorities.

It won't get fixed it neither party has a detailed bugreport :)
But please, not on this list, use bugzilla.atrpms.net and/or
bugzilla.livna.net. Thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070424/55a374e7/attachment-0002.bin