Cisco VPN Client and 2.6.22 Kernels

[fredex]

On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:20:20AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> > My impression is that vpnc is much more CPU demanding than
> > Cisco's VPN client.
> 
> 
> On the other hand, it's less likely to cause kernel panics and won't taint
> your kernel. Take your pick.
> 
> 
> Really, don't do heavy compute jobs while using the VPN and you'll be fine.

I use vpnc a lot, and I've never NOTICED that it hogs the CPU. And the
fact that it runs entirely in "user space" is a feature, as far as I"m
concerned.

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -----------------------------
               But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: 
                         While we were still sinners, 
                              Christ died for us.
------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070804/668a167c/attachment-0002.bin