bind/named problem?

[Charles Curley]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:48:28PM -0500, John Pierce wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I installed fedora 7 on one of my servers about 3 weeks ago and setup
> the local name server for my local network.  I set this up, originally
> ~3 years ago, because I was seeing some serious latency problems with
> my isp's name servers.  I also do a lot of repair on machines that
> belong to clients and just thought it would be easier to run my own
> nameservers.
> 

I have a similar setup and have my own local zone as well. I am not
seeing this problem. However, in /var/named/chroot/var/named/, files
are owned by root:named and the three directories (data, dynamic, and
slaves) by named:named. Also:

[root at charlesc etc]# ll /var/named/chroot/var/
total 40
drwxr-x--- 5 root  named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 .
drwxr-x--- 6 root  named 4096 2007-07-26 10:11 ..
drwxr-x--- 5 root  named 4096 2007-07-26 10:11 named
drwxr-x--- 4 root  named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 run
drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 tmp

Have you checked /var/log/messages for error messages?

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070812/4d897e64/attachment-0002.bin