the clock stopped in F7 ?!
Karl Larsen
k5di at zianet.com
Mon Aug 27 00:43:26 UTC 2007
Mike wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Tim wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 16:26 -0700, Mike wrote:
>>> Try 'cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer' two times or more.
>>>
>>> Look at the number just to the right of '0:'
>>>
>>> This should have incremented a bunch in between cat's. If it didn't
>>> then you likely have a hardware problem or the timer is failing to get
>>> initialized. If it is incrementing then I'm stumped...
>>
>> I don't have the original poster's problem, but I tried that command to
>> see what happens. The same results, each time:
>>
>> [root at bigblack ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
>> 0: 180 IO-APIC-edge timer
>>
>
> Weird. I wonder if there is another interrupt used to 'bump' the
> clock? Just for grins try it w/o the grep. There should be a list of
> a dozen or so interrupts. See if the line associated with rtc is
> 'racing'. Or maybe there's yet another interrupt used (other than
> ethX, ideX etc.).
>
> I had to do some precision timing in a previous life and had to muck
> with this stuff back then. At the time and even on the three machines
> I have here all use the timer interrupt to run the software clock. I
> 'spose other motherboards may do it differently...
>
> -- Mike
>
My clock is fine and never seems to be more than a few seconds off.
Here is my test:
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
0: 807 IO-APIC-edge timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
0: 807 IO-APIC-edge timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
0: 807 IO-APIC-edge timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
0: 807 IO-APIC-edge timer
[root at k5di ~]#
It is not changing either but my clock is accurate :-)
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
More information about the users
mailing list