the clock stopped in F7 ?!

Karl Larsen k5di at zianet.com
Mon Aug 27 00:43:26 UTC 2007


Mike wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Tim wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 16:26 -0700, Mike wrote:
>>> Try 'cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer' two times or more.
>>>
>>> Look at the number just to the right of '0:'
>>>
>>> This should have incremented a bunch in between cat's.  If it didn't
>>> then you likely have a hardware problem or the timer is failing to get
>>> initialized.  If it is incrementing then I'm stumped...
>>
>> I don't have the original poster's problem, but I tried that command to
>> see what happens.  The same results, each time:
>>
>> [root at bigblack ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
>>  0:        180   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>>
>
> Weird.  I wonder if there is another interrupt used to 'bump' the 
> clock? Just for grins try it w/o the grep.  There should be a list of 
> a dozen or so interrupts.  See if the line associated with rtc is 
> 'racing'.  Or maybe there's yet another interrupt used (other than 
> ethX, ideX etc.).
>
> I had to do some precision timing in a previous life and had to muck 
> with this stuff back then.  At the time and even on the three machines 
> I have here all use the timer interrupt to run the software clock.  I 
> 'spose other motherboards may do it differently...
>
> -- Mike
>
    My clock is fine and never seems to be more than a few seconds off. 
Here is my test:

[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
  0:        807   IO-APIC-edge      timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
  0:        807   IO-APIC-edge      timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
  0:        807   IO-APIC-edge      timer
[root at k5di ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
  0:        807   IO-APIC-edge      timer
[root at k5di ~]#

It is not changing either but my clock is accurate :-)

-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.




More information about the users mailing list