F8 Network Woe

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Dec 14 03:43:10 UTC 2007


Aaron Konstam:
>>> We already determined that 192.168.1.6 is not the machine's address,

Tim:
>> I don't recall seeing a message stating what was the true cause of the
>> rejection.

Aaron Konstam:
> When the OP ran service network restart
> it would not restart getting an error that that ip address was already
> in use. That means to me that the ip address could not be asigned to the
> machine in question. 

To the *interface* in question...  But anyway, I've already read that,
and it doesn't really address the first two quoted paragraphs above your
reply (the "why" and a proper "resolution").

By the way, who's crappy client made the subject line go "Re: Re: Re:"?

-- 
[tim at bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.23.1-10.fc7 i686 i386

Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5.  Today, it's FC7.

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.






More information about the users mailing list