Wi[r]eless security (was: Suspend bug)
David G. Miller
dave at davenjudy.org
Mon Feb 5 23:07:20 UTC 2007
Les <hlhowell at pacbell.net> wrote:
> Sounds like you did your "home" work. Sorry about the bad pun. But it
> is illuminating just how much the signals can penetrate and how far they
> can be detected, isn't it. The range also changes if one were to place
> a pre-amp and directional antenna on the card (as some war drivers do).
>
> Regards,
> Les H
Oh, come on. That's not a bad pun. Bad puns are REAL groaners.
I didn't realize that WEP had become as vulnerable as it seems to be. I
was also going on the assumption that the little traffic I generate
would make WEP key recovery difficult. It seems that current cracking
tools are able elicit traffic from an AP without connecting such that
the key can be recovered without seeing any traffic that I actually
generate. I guess the behavior isn't that surprising given how easily
wireless stuff connects.
Looks like I need to bump the priority on implementing WPA.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce
More information about the users
mailing list