Charset config of apache 2.x

edwardspl at ita.org.mo edwardspl at ita.org.mo
Wed Feb 21 23:56:03 UTC 2007


Hello,

I just re-config the following :

# AddDefaultCharset UTF-8

AddDefaultCharset Off

Then restart web service.

It seem okay now...

Edward.

Tim wrote:

>On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 23:45 +0800, edwardspl at ita.org.mo wrote:
>  
>
>>I just change the config of apache 2.x :
>># AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
>>AddDefaultCharset Big5
>>
>>But the result of display ( IE ) still utf-8...
>>So, how to fix the problem ?
>>    
>>
>
>Just to be sure that isn't an MSIE stupidity, try the same thing with
>lynx.  e.g. lynx --head http://www.example.com/your-test-page
>(replacing that fake URI with one from your testing server).  You'll get
>a page back with the headers that the server actually sent.
>
>Here's one I just tried, and it didn't return any charset information
>(as part of the Content-Type header).  Very naughty of it.  My web
>browser will presume that it's probably iso-8859-1, but that's a
>user-setting.
>
>$ lynx --head http://www.google.com.au/
>
>HTTP/1.0 200 OK
>Cache-Control: private
>Content-Type: text/html
>Set-Cookie: PREF=ID=0464941a5b709653:TM=1172074296:LM=1172074296:S=TAa056r0feal
>vnL6; expires=Sun, 17-Jan-2038 19:14:07 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com.au
>Server: GWS/2.1
>Content-Length: 0
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:11:36 GMT
>Connection: Keep-Alive
>
>
>And here's another example, this time it told me to expect iso-8859-1:
>
>$ lynx --head http://www.optus.com.au/
>
>HTTP/1.1 302 Found
>Set-Cookie: LBPRDPROXYEXT=346628f8346628f4baeebad6; path=/
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:13:31 GMT
>Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Win32) mod_ssl/2.0.52 OpenSSL/0.9.7e
>Location: http://www.optus.com.au/portal/site/oca
>Connection: close
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
>
>MSIE will sometimes be preset to presume something, rather than pay
>attention to the server.  It's also known to make stupid guesses.
>
>The "default" charset will be used when nothing else has preselected a
>particular one to be used.  Though, I'd recommend using UTF-8, it's
>created to replace numerous other encoding schemes with the one thing.
>
>It's also possible that individual HTML files might declare themselves
>to be a certain in encoding scheme, by a meta statement in the head of
>the HTML.  Though this is only to be paid attention to if the HTTP
>server didn't already specify the encoding in the HTTP headers.
>
>Hierarchy:
>     1. Pay attention to the HTTP headers, no matter what.
>     2. If there's no charset HTTP header information, look at a meta
>        statement.
>     3. If there's none of the above, it's up to the user to work out
>        what to do (they could preselect a default, configure their
>        browser to assess the page and make a guess, or the browser
>        might just presume iso-8859-1).
>
>The user can also preselect an encoding type, to override information
>provided by the server.  That allows you to read stuff that's been
>incorrectly identified.
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070222/ff8424e8/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the users mailing list