ESR: Goodbye Fedora
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Thu Feb 22 15:17:14 UTC 2007
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:19:34 -0600,
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The one that matters is that fedora isn't suitable for machine that need
> to be stable and reliable. I've always thought that a quick, easy
> solution to most surprises would be to let yum take a date/time option
> and ignore all updates after that time. That way you could stay almost
> up to date on your critical machines while watching the mail list for
> complaints by people with the newer changes. And, you could update a
> test machine and after testing, reliably update other boxes to the same
> versions that you tested even if new updates had gone in the repository.
You'd probably want the time specified as an interval to lag, rather than
a date.
More information about the users
mailing list