A really good article on software usability
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Mon Jan 8 07:00:19 UTC 2007
Tim:
>>>> I was helping someone come to terms with computing a while back, and
>>>> every time they closed a document, they'd be asked about saving it, and
>>>> they'd always say yes, no matter what.
Anne Wilson:
>>> But at least it's the safe option.
Tim:
>> But it wasn't. They were losing data and keeping broken copies. They
>> were saving unintentional changes to documents, irretrievably losing the
>> originals. Likewise, they were saving what were meant to be temporary
>> changes to documents (bit they didn't want printed, but still wanted in
>> the file).
Anne Wilson:
> Sorry, but there's no way on earth you can protect data from people who refuse
> to use the brain.
I know that, but I was arguing the point that it's not a "safe" option.
>>> So you don't consider print settings for the document to be a real
>>> change?
>> I don't. If I'd changed printer settings, perhaps. But just printing
>> the document, no. The "document" hasn't changed. Data about it may
>> have, if you keep track of how many times it's printed. But in the
>> usual sense of whether some document has changed, refers to the actual
>> content.
> That I had to test, as I had never seen it happen. I opened a document in
> OOWriter, one that I knew had been previously printed. I accepted the
> printer settings and printed it. I then closed it. No dialogue - it just
> closed.
With prior versions a default option was set that printing did that,
with later versions it doesn't (thankfully). Other word processors run
differently.
More information about the users
mailing list