How NSA access was built into Windows
craig at tobyhouse.com
Wed Jan 17 16:54:25 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 22:27 -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:10 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> > On Tue January 16 2007 12:49 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > > Selinux=0 may completely evacuate all selinux code from the boot
> > > process. Then, on the other hand, it may not.
> > Maybe you guys are thinking about this all wrong. Suppose that Selinux is
> > really a diversion. By forcing the question of mandatory access controls at
> > the kernel level, there's a team of specialists being trained who are
> > mastering in great depth, the detailed minutiae of how each daemon they
> > program for, functions at the lowest levels. The goal is to create the
> > specialist team that knows every hook, every detail, of low level operations
> > of all major sofware running in the OS.
> > Maybe I'm smoking too many cigars...
> Maybe it's Beagle? <evil cackles> That damn thing is a mystery to
> everyone on this list. Yet, it's still alive! Go figure. Ric
just in case it isn't obvious - the point of beagle is to provide a
ready in-depth searchable index of all text that has passed your way, be
it via e-mail, documents or web. It's ambitious, imperfect but a dfe
(damn fine effort).
More information about the users