How NSA access was built into Windows
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Jan 19 21:51:07 UTC 2007
Tim:
>> For some people, having it running certainly causes a performance
>> loss. Whether that's down to SELinux, itself, or the logging, I've
>> not experimented with.
Lyvim Xaphir:
> Have you been able to get around the lag with selinux=0?
Not that I want to be rude, but what other method do you think I used to
determine it was faster without SELinux? You can't remove it, as we've
established. And I must have disabled it to be able to tell that there
was a difference between having it and not. So my tests were between
having it enabled and not. I can't think how else I would have tested
that.
Yes, it did make a significant difference. But I've put up with the
slow down, as that machine was an internet accesible WWW server. I'd
rather play safe.
--
(Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users
mailing list