OCD programmers and backwards compatibility :-).
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Mon Jan 22 16:17:09 UTC 2007
Alan wrote:
>> Sounds like a better example of why linux should be more interested
>> in backwards compatibility than it seems to be now. Why change the /dev
>> names just because the underlying mechanism changes?
>>
>
> The /dev names are not set by the kernel but by convention. If you wish
> to call your first SCSI disk /dev/wombat you can, and the kernel doesn't
> mind at all.
>
How do you make that happen as the devices are autodetected? I'd much
prefer
to have things identified by controller/drive/lun where applicable than
to have
everything jump around when a new device appears and happens to be
detected first.
>> I can tell the only reason was a bunch of OCD programmers who broke
>> into a sweat every time they saw a directory named /usr/X11R6 instead
>> of /usr/share/X11 :-). The software worked just as well with either
>>
>
> They assumed anyone with an IQ of about 30 or higher could use "ln -s"
>
In other words they didn't care how much of how many people's time they
wasted. Just
so they could make names that sounded cute to them. This sort of
user-hostility can only
help Windows/OSX's market share.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the users
mailing list