spamassassin deps...

[Todd Zullinger]

Jorge Manta Bulhões wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why perl-libwww-perl is not a dep for
> spamassassin?

It's a packaging bug.

> Is there anything that breaks?

Yes, sa-update will break without it.  I was surprised to see that
this wasn't fixed in the latest spamassassin update.  It was covered
quite clearly in BZ#193100 (twice actually).  Care to mention this in
the bug again?  I'm guessing that Warren has his plate full preparing
for the RHEL5 release and this just slipped through.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193100

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
It's not denial. I'm just very selective about what I accept as
reality.
    -- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070126/bebb0f40/attachment-0002.bin