[OT] Mystery of chroot / MS fans

Gene Heskett gene.heskett at verizon.net
Mon Jul 23 08:32:30 UTC 2007


On Monday 23 July 2007, David Boles wrote:
>on 7/22/2007 9:37 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>>> Nobody needs to make a case against the convicted felon. The only case
>>>> yet to be made is against lack of real punishment of the criminal and
>>>> its body parts.
>>>
>>> "the convicted felon"? Just who are you calling "the convicted felon"?
>>
>>really BIG snip for the list<
>
>Andy. Thanks for all of the links, I have seen them before, but they, and
>you, still have not answered my question.
>
>Name the 'convicted felon' that was referred to here. None of the things
>listed in your links are felonies. they are, no lawyer here, probably
>civil law suits.

Violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act are most certainly a felony.  RICO 
also comes to mind.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Why, every one as they like; as the good woman said when she kissed her cow.
		-- Rabelais




More information about the users mailing list