F7 Silly question about system-config-samba
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Jun 22 02:38:58 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 13:28 +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
> for sure, I have understood that the only tool to be trusted is SWAT
> (neither Webmin nor system-config-display are working fine, some
> features are not working in both tools).
I'm sure you meant system-config-samba not -display, but I've always
been a little concerned about using third-party configuration tools.
They, typically, lag the development of the thing that they're
configuring, and may configure things as per the prior version of the
tool, or how the author *thought* it should be done.
For things like Samba, NFS, Apache, etc., I'd always edit the
configuration file, by hand.
(This box runs Centos 5.0, my others still run FC 4, 5, 6, & 7, in case that's
important to the thread.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users