Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)

[Anne Wilson]

On Saturday 19 May 2007, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Mauriat M wrote:
> > On 5/15/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >> Yep. If half of the people who are willing to discuss the nature of
> >> Fedora in length step further to actually contribute that would make a
> >> pretty big difference but alas folks are more interested in calling it
> >> unstable or wanting the distribution to including proprietary software
> >> by default.
> >>
> >> Next time you want to complain ask yourself how much you have
> >> contributed in anyway at all to a every growing collection of Free
> >> software included in a distribution that you can get for free. That
> >> includes a lot of work many of which is volunteer driven in maintaining
> >> around 8000 packages, documentation, artwork, QA, release engineering,
> >> infrastructure, marketing etc.
> >>
> >> You can choose to help.
> >
> > Must I contribute to expect a somewhat stable and useful general
> > purpose operating system?
>
> TANSTAAFL

What the blue blazes does that mean?

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070519/17983144/attachment-0002.bin