F8 ETA?

[John Summerfield]

Rick Stevens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:11 +0100, Adalbert Prokop wrote:
>> Tim Alberts wrote on Tuesday 30 October 2007:
>>
>>> It's certainly not selfish if you want run production servers...it just
>>> prompts the question (yet again), 'is Fedora production quality or just
>>> beta test for Redhat?'
>> You question implies there are only those two options available, which 
>> might not be true. In this case your question would be inane.
>>
>> I would neither assume Fedora being RedHat's *beta* playing ground nor 
>> would I use it for a server, which I *must* rely on.
>> I use it as my workstation OS and for my home server - I think that was 
>> the goal of Fedora and it does it job fair enough.
> 
> Actually, Fedora _is_ the beta stuff for RHEL.  There is no RHEL beta
> stuff...it's either RHEL or it's Fedora.  Example: RHEL5 is essentially
> Fedora Core 6.

RHEL does have betas, go look at the list of mailing lists.

> 
> Of course, I look more at it as a "technology preview" rather than beta,
> but I'm weird.

As you wish. Essentially, Fedora users are part of the test and 
evaluation program.


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu  Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

Please do not reply off-list